If the person signing is not the bidder the signatory
warrants that authority has
been given by the bidder.
Name of signatory ………………………………….
(please print)
Address …………………………………………..
(if different from bidder)
…………………………………………………….
Tel no ……………………………………………...
Capacity in which signed ………………………….
(eg Agent, Director, Solicitor etc)
Please note there should not be any alteration to the form and any mis-
I wish to bid by proxy/telephone (delete as required)
The bid that I hereby authorise is
Auction Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Lot no . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
\Maximum Bid £ (figures) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(words) . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(The figure must be a definite
one and is not to be calculated for example by reference to other bids such as one
bid above any other bid. Any uncertainty could result in Barnett Ross not bidding)
I
attach a cheque for £ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(being 10% of the maximum
bid)
Signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AUTHORITY FORM FOR BARNETT ROSS
TO BID ON BEHALF OF AN ABSENT BIDDER
Proposed purchaser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(for contact purposes)
(hereinafter called ‘The Bidder’)
Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tel No Business . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tel no Home . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
Solicitors Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tel No
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Person dealing .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I hereby authorise Barnett Ross staff on my behalf on the Terms and Conditions set
out over leaf headed “Bidding by telephone or by letter’ which I have read and understood.
In
the case of a proxy bid Barnett Ross Staff will bid on your behalf.
In case of a telephone
bid Barnett Ross staff will relay your bid provided that telephone contact is made.
23 February 2006
60
243 Portland Road
South Norwood
London SE25
NO MAX
ANDREW MAHON
3 PETTIGO ROAD, KESH
CO FERMANAGH, NORTHEREN
IRELAND, BT93 IQX
02868 632102
/ 07775 665878
And here it is . . . The blank . . . . . . . . . Of all the CRUCIAL elements that
ARE ESSENTIAL according to Barnett Ross’s own rules . . . AUTHORITY TO BID ON BEHALF
OF AN ABSENT BIDDER.
This is not the ACTUAL form presented in evidence . . . but it
is a pretty good representation of it.
Any scathing comments I could make about how
FRAUDULENT this document is would clearly be superfluous.
Except to say that the
handwriting looks THE SAME HANDWRITING as that of WHOEVER doctored the MEMORANDUMS
of SALE on the previous page.
In other words Andrew Mahon NEVER even saw this form
that he was supposed to have filled in.
From barnett Ross’s own rules . . “Bidding by telephone.”
1 The bidder must complete
a separate authority form for each lot . . . . . .
NOT Barnett Ross Auctioneers.
We laugh at Money Laundering Regulations. No identification
documents necessary. Just telephone and we’ll bid for you . No proxy form need be
filled in. No signature required. Don’t want to give a name? No problem. We make
one up for you . Steven Grossman makes sure YOU get that SPECIAL property. Contact
Andrew Mahon Northern Ireland for details. (Andrew Mahon specialises in gaining entry
to your property by pretending it’s his.)
Wankers @ IWG recommend Barnett Ross at
the Radisson Portman Hotel.
The claims made on this and other sites about Barnett Ross are based on documents lodged with The High Court of Justice which can be viewed by anyone willing to pay the appropriate Court fees.
David Rutter
Jaqueline
Hesketh
Alison Muir
Lisa
Richardson
Richard Carlson
Dawn Coller
Sarah Adlam
Jonathan Burton
Paul Garner
Simon Scott
Andy Littlefield
Andrew Davies
At the End where we find . . . . YET MCP Law say their client’s Aunty and Uncle were able to buy this property, through the patronage of plaintiff 1’s ‘fixer’ . . . . without having to go through ANY of the above. . . . . . . what an INCREDIBLE story . . . . . SWORN ON OATH TO THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. . . . by both plaintiffs and MCP’s J Burton and presented to the Court by Sarah Adlam and her pet Barrister Matthew Hutchings as FACT.
The main reason my Police sites were reinstated is not to have a go at dear old Sir Ian . . . He’s got enough criticism out there without mine. It was because it became impossible to re-
BUT a clever and only reasonably determined detective, (or reporter) who actually wants to clear up such crimes as PERJURY with WRITTEN EVIDENCE, . . .none of this hearsay stuff . . . . TO cover up FRAUD, CONSPIRACY to DEFRAUD, THEFT . . . and very likely, MONEY LAUNDERING as well . . . . . . needing only a day or so to spare . Can follow the clues on my sites . . . . then answer the question at the end.
Why have I had to re-
. . . . . . . and is still being ignored . . . That’s called . . . OPPRESSION by ABUSE of PROCESS.
“Additionally we would need some form of undertaking from your client in relation to him not re-
Merelie v Newcastle Primary Care Trust . . . .
23. Moreover, the Court will no doubt
generally be wary of any attempt to present as harassment, conduct which would more
aptly fit within the scheme of some other tort such as defamation, but which is not
available in itself as a cause of action for some reason (e.g. the statutory limitation
period). . . or because it’s TRUE
55. The early indications seem to be that the courts
are likely to seriously restrict the circumstances in which a claimant will be able
to use the 1997 Act to bring a claim which would otherwise fail.
A gentleman like my self doesn’t like to disparage a lady. And whilst some of them don’t actually deserve this treatment they are collectively responsible. . . Besides I doubt any of them gave a moments thought to the hurt and damage the DELIBERATE criminal behaviour of Rutter, Richardson, Burton and ADLAM . . caused my lovely wife and kids over these past two years.
ROGUES GALLERY
PARTNERS IN CRIME
The CROOKS at MCP Law
On Scotland Yards own NOT official web site
www.sir-
You want to catch a few criminal easy peasy Ian?
Here they are.
Conspiracy to Defraud Contrary to Common Law. You won’t even have to do the leg work . . .it’s all here on my sites. Just follw the footsteps. Might be safer to stick to asbos on Kids though. Locking Lawyers up is a bit tricky. You never know what Lodge they’re in.
Steven Grossman MRICS
sgrossman@barnettross.co.uk
On this page. . . What we are asked to believe is that Andrew Mahon on behalf of
plaintiff 2’s Aunty and Uncle picked up the phone from Northern Ireland. And bid
£112,000 on the basis of THIS FORM on THIS PAGE. Without a single signature from
himself. Or signature from either Aunty or Uncle giving him permission to do so,
or for the Auctioneers to change the bidder’s name to theirs. . . . or would have
been theirs if RIDACO DEVELOPMENTS had been anything to do with them.. . . . . .
UNCREDIBLE.
But it must be true BECAUSE JONATHAN BURTON AND SARAH ADLAM AND BOTH
THE PLAINTIFFS HAVE SWORN TO IT UNDER OATH.
10 . Participating in fraudulent business carried on by company etc.: penalty
(1)
In Schedule 24 to the Companies Act 1985 (punishment of offences), in column 4 of
the entry relating to section 458 of that Act, for “7 years” substitute "10 years".
(2) In Schedule 23 to the Companies (Northern Ireland) Order 1986 (punishment of
offences), in column 4 of the entry relating to Article 451 of that Order, for “7
years” substitute "10 years".
10 YEARS . Come on the MET . . Get busy.
BARNETTROSS Notice to all bidders (In RED)
14. PROOF OF IDENTIFICATION The purchaser
and/or bidder is to provide original documentation to confirm proof of name and address.
Please refer to page 1 for acceptable documentation.
Page 1 . . . The purchaser and
bidder is to provide one original document from each column together with a copy
for us to attach to the contract.
And since this form has ABSOLUTELY NO LEGAL VALUE WHATSOEVER . .
WHAT IS IT DOING
IN THE FILE? WHO WAS IT MEANT TO DECEIVE? OTHER THAN THE BANK TO GET A LARGE MORTGAGE?